Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rutuja Bhosale vs Yi Tsen Cho Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bhosale vs Cho analysis and find out who is favored!
Rutuja Bhosale vs Yi Tsen Cho Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bhosale 0 - 0 Cho
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bhosale has won 41.76% of points on his second serve, while Cho has won 43.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bhosale, in recent form, has won 53.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cho has won 54.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.44% and 37.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bhosale has saved 51.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cho has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bhosale has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 28/ 20), with Cho winning 47.62% (W/L 20/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bhosale has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 177/ 134), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Cho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 9/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bhosale has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20), where as Cho has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bhosale has played against opponents with an average rank of 332.46 while Cho has played against players with an average rank of 182.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bhosale has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cho has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bhosale has converted 41.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cho has converted 37.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bhosale 0 - 0 Cho
388
Rank
313
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
668
Rank
612
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
56% (204-162)
Career Total W/L
53% (76-67)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
38% (5-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rutuja Bhosale | Yi Tsen Cho |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 38% (5/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (30/26) | 47% (14/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (258/245) | 51% (130/126) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (12/9) | 38% (5/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.6 | 173.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (932/1426) | 58% (454/780) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (558/932) | 68% (307/454) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (199/494) | 45% (146/326) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (87/234) | 39% (41/105) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (728/1593) | 42% (376/886) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (10/11) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Rutuja Bhosale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Arina Rodionova
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
74%
(
92 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
58 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
53 of
95)
119
Total Points Won
100
|
6-1 6-7(5) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Aoi Ito
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Petra Hule
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
76%
(
93 of
123)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
56 of
93)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
49 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zarina Diyas
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Haru Ohno
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Unknown Player
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Xinyu Gao
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yi Tsen Cho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yi Tsen Cho
Player
Yifan Sun
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yi Tsen Cho
Player
Shutong Qu
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Meiqi Guo
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
26
Total Points Won
18
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
86%
(
57 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yi Tsen Cho
Player
Yajing Cao
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yufei Ren
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve %
50%
(
10 of
20)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
28
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
106)
2
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
8
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yi Tsen Cho
Player
Jiaqi Wang
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bhosale Vs Cho Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
